Results for “paul r. williams”

This article tells you the "why?"

how we beat c-19

But it doesn’t matter that "most cases are mild" because roughly 20% of those who contract the disease require a hospital visit and about a quarter of those people require ventilators. We need to keep people from getting the disease because if we don’t we’ll be turning away a lot of sick people from getting proper treatment and many of those will die.

Jeez what? If you have a problem with what he said then refute his claims.

There’s a difference between stating your beliefs (something that could actually be refuted) vs going off the deep end to tell someone you hope they’re taking their meds and seeing their therapist and then telling them it won’t be long before they’re out of work.

You can understand that, right? I hope you can,.

If you’re into it, the ‘epi’ R package is a great tool to play with.

Thanks, but I never questioned the spread. I just questioned LADude’s statement that San Francisco hospitals were "already overwhelmed" and "pretty much where Italy was at a week ago" when the actual posted numbers prove otherwise. It’s important that we don’t spread misinformation or panic.

Also, I’ve known about Tomas Pueyo’s article for a few days; as new data continue to come in, many of his assumptions have been thrown into doubt. Bill Gates did a very good AMA on Reddit yesterday which provided a lot of well-informed perspective, you should check it out. https://www.reddit.com/r/Coronavirus/comments/fksnbf/im_bill_gates_cochair_of_the_bill_melinda_gates/

That’s certainly not government "funneling more money to their pals" and goes against the mentality who constantly bitch that government spends too much. The article you picked shows a government that’s sitting on cash and not paying their obligations, which is the reverse problem.

do you think Italy showed exponential growth? I mean, we don’t even know what’s happening because most people aren’t being tested

ugh.

jeez…

No, Libs don’t want "population control". What a deranged thing to say. Many liberals (not all) do want responsible stewardship of our resources.

What you wrote would be similar to me saying, "don’t all cons want to destroy the earth? Claiming that resources are abundant.". It’s warped logic.