A guide to the Crenshaw Line—opening in 2021

Construction on the Crenshaw/LAX Line is more than 90 percent complete.

One of Los Angeles’s most anticipated transit projects, an 8.5-mile light rail line connecting South LA to the South Bay, won’t open in 2020, as planned.

According to a Metro staff report, the agency’s Crenshaw/LAX Line, once expected to open in 2019, is now projected to be ready for riders by next year at the earliest.

The report indicates that Walsh/Shea Corridor Constructors—the contractor tasked with building the project—has fallen behind schedule due to “damaged, incomplete and missing components” in “several areas of work” along the new rail route. The Los Angeles Times reports that steel reinforcements were installed incorrectly in more than 100 locations where this work will now need to be redone.

This month, the agency’s Board of Directors will consider adding $90 million to the project’s budget to cover the expense of extending the timeline. That brings the project’s total cost to more than $2.1 billion.

Once complete, the train line will link the existing E (formerly Expo) and C (formerly Green) lines, and will bring riders to within a short shuttle ride of Los Angeles International Airport. Eventually, it’s slated to connect with a LAX people mover system that local officials have billed as a longterm fix to the airport’s notorious traffic congestion.

The delay is a significant setback for one of Metro’s most high-profile projects, but Metro staff indicate that construction could still wrap up by the end of the year (at which point, the agency would perform several months of testing before opening the train to riders).

Here’s what else to know about the train line, which will eventually become the seventh route in Metro’s expanding rail network.

Where does it go?

The Crenshaw/LAX Line is slated to travel as far north as Hollywood, likely winding through Mid-Wilshire and West Hollywood along the way. But that portion of the project will be constructed in a separate phase.

A map detailing the Crenshaw/LAX Line route
Metro

For now, the train’s northernmost stop will be at the intersection of Crenshaw and Exposition boulevards, where riders can transfer to and from the E Line. From there, the train will proceed down Crenshaw, making stops at Martin Luther King Boulevard, Leimert Park Village, and Slauson Avenue. It hooks west for stops near Florence Avenue and West Boulevard, Florence and La Brea, and Florence and Manchester. The train then rolls on to Aviation and Century boulevards before meeting up with the C Line’s Aviation station south of LAX.

Neighborhoods served by the train include Leimert Park, Baldwin Hills, Hyde Park, and Westchester, along with the city of Inglewood.

When does it open?

The line was originally scheduled to be up and running in 2019, but multiple construction delays have pushed back its anticipated arrival to 2021. According to a recent project status report, construction is 95 percent complete and could wrap up by December. After that, Test trains are already running along the route, but Metro staff don’t expect the train will be ready for riders until sometime next year.

Does it go to LAX?

Not exactly. The project was partially conceived as a long-awaited transit link to LA’s busiest airport, but it won’t actually bring airline passengers to their terminals. Instead, riders can board or exit the train at a planned stop at 96th Street and Aviation Boulevard. That station is scheduled to be complete in 2023, when a new people mover tram system is expected to be up-and-running at the airport.

From the new station, riders will be able to transfer to the people mover—which connects to the terminal area and a rental car facility. While those projects are under construction, riders can board free bus shuttles that will connect to the airport from the Aviation/Century station.

A rendering of the people mover at LAX
Courtesy Mayor of Los Angeles
Is this a subway?

The train will run underground for its first three stops before emerging onto Crenshaw south of Vernon Avenue. Parts of the line’s southern portion run along elevated platforms, but much of the track has been laid at street level—similar to the E and A (formerly Blue) lines.

Early plans for the light rail line called for the train to run entirely at street-level along Crenshaw. Community activists, however, argued that this would disrupt local businesses and endanger pedestrians. Eventually, Metro agreed to dig two mile-long tunnels connecting the Expo/Crenshaw and Martin Luther King stations.

Will it always be called the Crenshaw/LAX Line?

No. The Crenshaw/LAX Line is really only a working title (and not exactly one that rolls off the tongue). Metro hasn't yet confirmed what name the line will operate under, but a memo delivered last year to the agency’s Board of Directors suggests it could be the K Line, in keeping with Metro’s new letter-based naming system.

Will there be a stop at the new NFL stadium?

While the new train line does have a Downtown Inglewood station, it conspicuously bypasses the city’s rapidly developing sports and entertainment district, where the Rams and Chargers will play home games in 2020.

That’s partly because plans for the enormous new stadium weren’t finalized when Metro began construction on the new line and partly because the southern tracks follow an old railroad right-of-way that the agency already owned prior to the project’s conception.

Inglewood Mayor James Butts, who currently chairs Metro’s Board of Directors, has pushed for a people mover-style transit connection to the stadium and the nearby Forum, but it’s not yet clear when construction might start on this project or how it would be funded.

How will the train affect the neighborhoods it passes through?

Once up and running, the new line will be a very visible presence, particularly along Crenshaw Boulevard. As major developments get underway in the area, like the massive residential and retail complex planned at Baldwin Hills Crenshaw Plaza, communities along the rail line could change further.

To preserve Crenshaw’s identity as the main street of black Los Angeles, community leaders are planning a large open-air museum called Destination Crenshaw running along the street-level tracks between 48th and 60th streets. Metro will kick in at least $15 million to fund construction of a small park at the intersection of Crenshaw and Leimert boulevards, which will be incorporated into the project.

When will the northern segment open?
Proposed routes for the Crenshaw/LAX Line’s northern extension.
Via Metro

Right now, the second phase of the project isn’t scheduled to break ground until 2041—and open six years after that.

Fortunately for those who might want to ride sometime in the next quarter century, Metro is working on speeding up that timeline. The agency is now analyzing potential routes for the train line so that work can get under way as soon as finances become available.

The project would primarily be funded through Measure M, the sales tax measure approved by Los Angeles County voters in 2016. The city of West Hollywood, eager for a train line that serves the city, has proposed kicking in up to $1 billion to ensure the project arrives ahead of schedule.

How many people will ride?

The train will only carry about 32,400 daily riders by 2035, according to Metro projections. That’s a little more than half the number served by the E Line on an average weekday in 2018. But the number of passengers should could nearly triple once the project’s second phase is complete, and Metro officials earlier this year suggested it could eventually be the nation’s busiest light rail corridor.

South LA

As South LA changes, Destination Crenshaw is ‘absolutely necessary’

Crenshaw

Mixed-use development planned near Crenshaw Line stop at Baldwin Hills Crenshaw Plaza

Leimert Park

City looking for ideas to redevelop two Leimert Park parking lots

View all stories in Crenshaw Line

Comments

Build the Northern Extension! And soon. It is very likely a Hollywood Bowl station will be added as the terminus.

the stop at the Hollywood bowl would be great – always such a cluster during events. a people mover to get people from Downtown Inglewood to the stadium also sounds like smart step.

I really doubt that. The Bowl is up in the mountains and 99% of the time it has no ridership demand. The walk from the Hollywood/Highland Station is actually pretty easy too.

Agree. Hollywood / Highland is already close enough. Most people park around there anyways.

In preliminary studies of construction feasibility, Metro has found the closest TBM launching location to be the Hollywood Bowl. Installing a station there would be very cheap since the tunnel would already be built from there to Hollywood/Highland.

You’d still have to build a station and those cost $200M or more and there would need to be more tunneling and of course additional operational costs in operating a longer line.

Agreed, but what if the Bowl agreed to pay 50%+ of the station construction?

I think the idea is to add the station at minimal cost. The philosophy is to add the station without making the tunnel itself any longer. The station therefore may still be a 5-minute walk from the bowl but that’s better than 15-minutes from Hollywood/Highland.

Operationally I’d think the cost of 1 extra mile wouldn’t be too significant in the grand scheme of things. If operation is an issue, then just terminate trains at Hollywood/Highland except for Bowl events.

Why would you travel from Fairfax / Wilshire to Crenshaw / Vernon or father?
The 217 bus that runs on Fairfax is never full.

Dude, this is LA. They won’t have a Hollywood Bowl station because that would make far too much sense.

In preliminary studies of construction feasibility, Metro has found the closest TBM launching location to be the Hollywood Bowl. Installing a station there would be very cheap since the tunnel would already be built from there to Hollywood/Highland.

There is a Red Line station at Hollywood and Highland which is just down the hill from the Bowl. In fact, the Bowl runs a shuttle from the station to the Bowl during concerts so its’ a non issue. I’ve taken it a number of times and it works very well. In fact, after the concert, I leisurely walk down the hill. Good to stretch your legs after being at a concert for a couple of hours.

You’re the writer of The Pink Line blog correct? Super great source, and I always love reading your opinion pieces! What do you think of building a branch and trunk concurrently? La Brea alternative with a spur west along Santa Monica Blvd connecting to the Purple Line at La Cienega/Wilshire?

I really love how this website posts tiny, illegible maps and provides no ability to enlarge them.

Uhh, every image in this post (and every other post I can think of) can be clicked to enlarge it.

ah, no mouseover indicator. still, the 2nd map goes from about 5 pixels to 6.

Welcome to BART, Los Angeles

How so?

Why doesn’t it terminate inside LAX? Are there any other Major international airports without a rail line ? Once constructed it would take little above ground space and there would be no need for shuttles.

Because people don’t want to walk around LAX.
There will be a small train circling around LAX and the subway station.

Based on the rather tortured route of the people mover, I’d guess it’s because space was pretty tight. Potential cost was probably prohibitive.

Because LA Metro likes to do everything wrong in an effort to reduce ridership. They have been doing an excellent job of that.

Why doesn’t what terminate inside LAX? The Crenshaw Line? That would not work for a whole host of reasons including the fact that you would limit access to LAX to one line. Also, the Crenshaw line will not end at LAX it continues to go South which means you would have passengers going through LAX that don’t need to go there but would have no other choice than just to stay on the train until it leaves LAX to continue further South.

The benefit of the People Mover is that it will connect to both the Green Line and Crenshaw Line and only people needing to go to LAX need to get on the People Mover which will be automated.

International airports without a rail line that terminates inside the airport:
JFK (AirTrain is a separate line with it’s own boarding costs, not a subway fare)
Boston (Have to take a bus to the trains, just like LA)
LGA
LAS
MCO
OAK

It’s not all that uncommon.

The Green Line was originally intended to terminate at LAX, but the FAA worried about frequency interference from the rail catenary (overhead electric power). An underground terminus didn’t satiate their concern, thus they are building an above ground people-mover and we are opening this LAX Line.

"but much of the track has been laid at street level—similar to the Expo and Blue lines" That worked out well so why not repeat it here. And if they didn’t have the funding, they should have waited to get the funding or just stopped the billions per year LA County in spending on illegal aliens and used that money.

View All Comments
Back to top ↑