The new owner of a large retirement community in Westwood has handed out eviction notices to more than 150 residents in preparation for a major overhaul of the property that will transform it into a luxury residential care facility.
According to a press release from Los Angeles City Councilmember Paul Koretz, Watermark Retirement Communities plans to evict all current tenants under California’s Ellis Act, which allows landlords to mass evict tenants when converting buildings to new uses.
The building resident’s include Joseph Goldfarb, a 99-year-old Holocaust survivor, who told ABC News that the new owners “should have a heart.”
Koretz held a press conference Monday calling on Watermark to consider alternative plans for the renovations that would not require residents to relocate. Many of them are in their 80s and 90s.
“I am outraged and disgusted by this entire situation, and since learning of the eviction notices on December 2nd, I have been working to do everything I can to stop the process,” Koretz said.
The councilmember also plans to introduce a motion during Tuesday’s City Council meeting asking city staff to examine options to halt the eviction process. At the press conference, Koretz called on concerned citizens to contribute to a “pressure campaign,” bombarding Watermark with letters and emails opposing the evictions.
For its part, Waterton maintains in an official press release that the $50 million renovation would be impossible to complete with residents in the building and that it has hired a “Relocation Liaison” to help residents find places to live in advance of construction on the property.
According to ABC News, the eviction notices delivered November 30 gave tenants 120 days to vacate the building, though Watermark claims that most residents will have “up to a year” to leave the apartments. The company also notes that tenants would receive “up to $19,700” in relocation fees, though this simply represents the minimum amount Watermark would be required by law to provide to longtime tenants under the city’s Rent Stabilization Ordinance.
The company, which manages dozens of senior living facilities in 20 states, took over management of the building in October, and quickly made plans to transform it into a licensed facility under the California Department of Social Services. In an announcement of the purchase, Watermark President and CEO David Barnes noted that the structure once served as a residence hall for students at UCLA.
“We’re looking forward to rolling out Watermark University and other signature programs,” he said, referring to the company’s practice of offering residents classes in subjects ranging from poetry to wine appreciation.
Watermark expects the renovations will take between 12 and 14 months to complete.
- LA Housing Department Wants to Clamp Down on Mass Evictions [Curbed LA]
- Mapped: Where Mass Rent-Control Evictions Are Ramping Up in LA [Curbed LA]
Comments
If you think this is disgusting, call Annie at Watermark – (877) 793-2540 – and tell her so.
By godwillen on 12.12.16 5:34pm
Buildings cannot be properly renovated while occupied.
Period.
Most of the rental housing stock has 40 years, or more, of deferred maintenance, the direct consequence of rent control.
They need to be stripped to the studs, re-plumbed (including new sewer lines), re-wired, often with new sub-floors, repairs to termite and water damage, re-insulated, re-roofed, with all new fixtures and glazing. In some cases, there is foundation work.
By smartalex on 12.12.16 11:14pm
the reality is they know they can charge a lot more for senior housing in that location. Vintage was probably one of the best deals in town and the facility wasn’t luxurious but it wasn’t run down either. this is simple economics and private industry going for bigger profits. it can be either good or bad depending on what vantage point you are looking at it from. it’s the way of the world we live in.
By LAoneWay on 12.13.16 7:37am
Merry Christmas, old people! We’ll think about you during our wine appreciation classes…
By enter ranting on 12.13.16 9:04am
This is kind of a tough one – does Watermark have to wait until every single resident of the building passes away in order to conduct renovations? That’s a bit much to ask. But at the same time, I feel for the seniors here. Hope a satisfactory agreement is reached.
By MMVic on 12.13.16 10:07am
Probably could have waited until spring to make the announcement, at the very least.
By Iwuvcapra on 12.13.16 5:30pm
This building is THIS company’s property. They want to renovate THEIR property. They are complying with the applicable laws. Does it suck for the renters, yes. But there is no actual issue?
By LADude on 12.13.16 4:31pm
This is horrible. This is how we care for the elderly. Of course this group of elderly live in one of the best areas of L.A. where affordable housing is non existent. So now we see…No matter how privileged you think you are one day your luck will run out.
By starlyn on 12.15.16 11:17am