clock menu more-arrow no yes

Filed under:

Rents in Los Angeles Shooting Up Faster Than in San Francisco

New, 31 comments


San Francisco has the nuttiest rental scene in the US—potential renters have to show up with mountains of paperwork and compete with dozens of other highly-paid people just for the privilege of paying crazy high prices—but rents actually declined in the city last quarter, while they shot way up in Los Angeles. According to a rental report from rental site Lovely, median rent in LA was a scorching $1,850 in the first quarter of 2014, up more than 13 percent over the first quarter of 2013 and 8 percent over just the quarter before. (Meanwhile, San Francisco rents only went up 8 percent over the first quarter of 2013, although with such a high median price [$3,200] it has a lot less room for growth.)

Even more troublingly, Lovely found that a spike in median rent across all sizes of apartments (whereas in San Francisco, rents on studios climbed hugely over last year, but rents on two-bedrooms only went up a little). That means everyone is being hit hard by LA's rental crisis, the result of growing inequality, lack of supply for low- and median-income renters, and the complete unaffordability of buying, which has given LA the highest percentage of renters in the country. All Lovely can do is recommend you live with a roommate (or maybe your entire extended family). And guess what: "we will likely see the rent prices continue to rise with summer months ahead of us."
· Los Angeles is in a Rental Crisis [Curbed LA]
· Are You Sitting Down? SF's Median Rent Rate is $3,200/Month [Curbed SF]